May 24, 2024 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better & Not Necessary! – Part 2

The dream of our beachfront city is about to become a nightmare! Just imagine a tsunami of these projects washing onto the beaches of Santa Monica over the next 10 years – sad, no – alarming! The proposed project supplanting Gelson’s market at Lincoln & Ocean Park is much higher, much denser, with more traffic, and overall a horrific model for the future of our city. Otherwise, I don’t see a problem with it – do you?!

Last week’s article described how a basic code-compliant design can produce the same economic return without a 50% increase in density, without taller buildings, without increasing traffic, with all landscape in pots, etc., etc., etc. With lower overall development costs for construction and financing along with a design that produces moderately higher rents and less vacancy all serve to render the same economic return without the 50% increase in density, the taller buildings, the increased traffic problems, etc., etc., etc. This week’s article illustrates a basic code-complying design without taking advantage of our ill-conceived zoning code allowances which are totally unnecessary, and which will lead Santa Monica down a very, very destructive path.

Using the same ratio of 1 bedroom, 2 bedroom, and studio apartments along with a comparable parking ratio, the following list along with the illustrations describe the significant differences of what is proposed in contrast to what is possible.

  1. Buildings with narrow paved setbacks hugging sidewalks and alleys 5 and 10 feet away, instead of 10 to 25 feet of landscaped setbacks!
  2. 850 cars entering into and exiting from subterranean parking primarily on Lincoln and bringing traffic on Lincoln to a standstill, instead of 515 cars entering and exiting on a landscaped driveway from Ocean Park!
  3. a huge 1 & 2 level subterranean parking structure extending to all four property lines without leaving a square foot available for in-ground landscaping, in contrast to 4 separate, smaller single level structures covering only 67% of the site!
  4. a green-painted paved finish over the subterranean garage as suggested on the applicants’ submittal, with a variety of trees planted in pots, instead of one third of the site available for in-ground, drought tolerant landscaping, trees, and pools!
  5. only linear shops along the Lincoln & Ocean Park sidewalks, instead of commercial space opening to an outdoor mall of trellis covered patios fronting active & passive park areas as well as sidewalk-facing shops!
  6. 5 & 6 story block buildings 20-30 feet apart, instead of 2 & 3 story terraced buildings, 40-60 feet apart with more sunlight instead of shading & winds!
  7. apartments staring into neighbor’s windows 20-30 feet away, instead of the majority of apartments 40-60 feet of separation with windows providing cross-ventilation and looking out in multiple directions
  8. 5 foot wide, 70 foot long enclosed and dark corridors with apartment doors opposite each other, instead of open-air hallway corridors serving 2 to 4 staggered apartment entrances
  9. and significantly taller buildings blocking views and casting shadows on neighboring properties immediately to the south and east instead of roof heights being the same or lower than adjacent neighbors!
  10. and a structural system that coordinates garage column spacing with building bearing walls above, offering significant savings in construction costs
  11. etc., etc., etc.

And with all these significant advantages, the economic r.o.i. (return-on-investment) is virtually the same as outlined in detail in last week’s article. C’mon Santa Monica, stand up and put a stop to this unnecessary destruction before it’s too late! Good design is good economics!! Allowing 50% increases in density, especially without a proportionate increase in affordable units is crazy – no, it’s lunacy!! Do residents, visitors, and tourists live in or visit our city to see ugly, tall, dense block buildings? Of course not, we’re better than this. We don’t need to give developers the right to make yet more money when you have a code that allows an equally fair return without seriously damaging our community. Let’s scale things down, and while we’re at it, let’s adopt a real master plan, not a general plan, and a new zoning code that works for us – one that doesn’t destroy us! Wake up Santa Monica – City Council, staff, and residents – before it’s too late!!

Hopefully, or sadly,
Ron Goldman FAIA
for SMa.r.t. (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow)

Thane Roberts AIA, Architect, Robert H. Taylor AIA, Mario Fonda-Bonardi AIA, Ron Goldman FAIA, Daniel Jansenson Architect, Samuel Tolkin AIA, Marc Verville, MBA, CPA (Inactive); Michael Jolly, AIR-CRE. For previous articles see www.santamonicaarch.wordpress.com/writings.

in Opinion
Related Posts

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path Forward for Santa Monica: Part II

May 19, 2024

May 19, 2024

As referenced in Part I of this article, the state’s use of faulty statistics and forceful legislation has left a...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path Forward for Santa Monica: Part I

May 12, 2024

May 12, 2024

To quickly summarize, California grapples with an ongoing housing crisis spurred by state implementation of over 100 policies and mandates...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Where Will Our Huddled Masses Sleep? Navigating California’s Affordable Housing Mandates

May 5, 2024

May 5, 2024

Just as Lady Liberty beckons the “huddled masses” of immigrants to America, cities like Santa Monica have an ethical obligation...

SM.a.r.t Column: SMCLC SPEAKS

April 28, 2024

April 28, 2024

SMart (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow) periodically invites guest columnists who have made a significant contribution to the...

SM.a.r.t Column: Building Modern Boxes Lacks Identity

April 21, 2024

April 21, 2024

In the relentless pursuit of modernity, cities worldwide have witnessed the rise of so-called architectural marvels in the form of...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Santa Monica Needs Responsible Urban and Architectural Design

April 14, 2024

April 14, 2024

[SMa.r.t. note: Eight years ago, our highly esteemed and recently-passed colleague Ron Goldman documented his thoughts on the need for...

SM.a.r.t. Column: BLINK NOW!

April 7, 2024

April 7, 2024

Nine years ago, I wrote a column for SMa.r.t. titled SANTA MONICA: BEACH TOWN OR ‘DINGBAT’ CITY? (https://smdp.com/2015/05/09/santa-monica-beach-town-dingbat-city/)Here is the...

SM.a.r.t Column: ARB Courage (Part 2 of 2)

March 31, 2024

March 31, 2024

Last week we discussed the numerous flaws of the Gelson’s project as a perfect example of what not to do...

ARB Courage (Part 1 of 2)

March 24, 2024

March 24, 2024

On March 4, 2024, your ARB (Architectural Review Board) ruled in favor of the 521-unit Gelson’s Project at Ocean Park...

SM.a.r.t Column: Can California ARBs Balance Affordable Housing with Community Character in the Face of New Housing Laws?

March 17, 2024

March 17, 2024

By suggestion, I attended the March 4th ARB (Architectural Review Board) meeting that addressed the Gelson Lincoln Boulevard Project.  After...

S.M.a.r.t Column: On the Need for Safety

March 10, 2024

March 10, 2024

Earlier this week, in the dark pre-dawn hours, a pair of thugs covered in masks and hoodies burst into the...

Film Review: The Oscar Landscape 2024

March 7, 2024

March 7, 2024

FILM REVIEWTHE OSCAR LANDSCAPE 2024A Look at the Choices – Academy Awards – March 10, 2024, at 5:00 p.m. on...

S.M.a.r.t Column: Five Saving Historic Santa Monica

March 3, 2024

March 3, 2024

Our beloved City is surrounded by many threats, from sea level rise to homelessness, to housing affordability, to cancerous overdevelopment,...

S.M.a.r.t Column: Gelson’s Looms Large

February 22, 2024

February 22, 2024

Our guest column this week is by SMCLC (the Santa Monica Coalition for a Livable City). SMCLC is a well-established...

S.M.a.r.t Column: Top Toady Town

February 18, 2024

February 18, 2024

Throughout history, from the ancient Romans and Assyrians to Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine, siege warfare has served as an...