October 1, 2023 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Is Gelson’s Our Future? Bigger Is Not Better & Not Necessary! – Part 2

The dream of our beachfront city is about to become a nightmare! Just imagine a tsunami of these projects washing onto the beaches of Santa Monica over the next 10 years – sad, no – alarming! The proposed project supplanting Gelson’s market at Lincoln & Ocean Park is much higher, much denser, with more traffic, and overall a horrific model for the future of our city. Otherwise, I don’t see a problem with it – do you?!

Last week’s article described how a basic code-compliant design can produce the same economic return without a 50% increase in density, without taller buildings, without increasing traffic, with all landscape in pots, etc., etc., etc. With lower overall development costs for construction and financing along with a design that produces moderately higher rents and less vacancy all serve to render the same economic return without the 50% increase in density, the taller buildings, the increased traffic problems, etc., etc., etc. This week’s article illustrates a basic code-complying design without taking advantage of our ill-conceived zoning code allowances which are totally unnecessary, and which will lead Santa Monica down a very, very destructive path.

Using the same ratio of 1 bedroom, 2 bedroom, and studio apartments along with a comparable parking ratio, the following list along with the illustrations describe the significant differences of what is proposed in contrast to what is possible.

  1. Buildings with narrow paved setbacks hugging sidewalks and alleys 5 and 10 feet away, instead of 10 to 25 feet of landscaped setbacks!
  2. 850 cars entering into and exiting from subterranean parking primarily on Lincoln and bringing traffic on Lincoln to a standstill, instead of 515 cars entering and exiting on a landscaped driveway from Ocean Park!
  3. a huge 1 & 2 level subterranean parking structure extending to all four property lines without leaving a square foot available for in-ground landscaping, in contrast to 4 separate, smaller single level structures covering only 67% of the site!
  4. a green-painted paved finish over the subterranean garage as suggested on the applicants’ submittal, with a variety of trees planted in pots, instead of one third of the site available for in-ground, drought tolerant landscaping, trees, and pools!
  5. only linear shops along the Lincoln & Ocean Park sidewalks, instead of commercial space opening to an outdoor mall of trellis covered patios fronting active & passive park areas as well as sidewalk-facing shops!
  6. 5 & 6 story block buildings 20-30 feet apart, instead of 2 & 3 story terraced buildings, 40-60 feet apart with more sunlight instead of shading & winds!
  7. apartments staring into neighbor’s windows 20-30 feet away, instead of the majority of apartments 40-60 feet of separation with windows providing cross-ventilation and looking out in multiple directions
  8. 5 foot wide, 70 foot long enclosed and dark corridors with apartment doors opposite each other, instead of open-air hallway corridors serving 2 to 4 staggered apartment entrances
  9. and significantly taller buildings blocking views and casting shadows on neighboring properties immediately to the south and east instead of roof heights being the same or lower than adjacent neighbors!
  10. and a structural system that coordinates garage column spacing with building bearing walls above, offering significant savings in construction costs
  11. etc., etc., etc.

And with all these significant advantages, the economic r.o.i. (return-on-investment) is virtually the same as outlined in detail in last week’s article. C’mon Santa Monica, stand up and put a stop to this unnecessary destruction before it’s too late! Good design is good economics!! Allowing 50% increases in density, especially without a proportionate increase in affordable units is crazy – no, it’s lunacy!! Do residents, visitors, and tourists live in or visit our city to see ugly, tall, dense block buildings? Of course not, we’re better than this. We don’t need to give developers the right to make yet more money when you have a code that allows an equally fair return without seriously damaging our community. Let’s scale things down, and while we’re at it, let’s adopt a real master plan, not a general plan, and a new zoning code that works for us – one that doesn’t destroy us! Wake up Santa Monica – City Council, staff, and residents – before it’s too late!!

Hopefully, or sadly,
Ron Goldman FAIA
for SMa.r.t. (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow)

Thane Roberts AIA, Architect, Robert H. Taylor AIA, Mario Fonda-Bonardi AIA, Ron Goldman FAIA, Daniel Jansenson Architect, Samuel Tolkin AIA, Marc Verville, MBA, CPA (Inactive); Michael Jolly, AIR-CRE. For previous articles see www.santamonicaarch.wordpress.com/writings.

in Opinion
Related Posts

S.M.a.r.t Column: Civic Center Debate

September 24, 2023

September 24, 2023

Civic Center Debate Last year, the City declared the Civic Center Auditorium surplus property after a decade of neglect and...

SMa.r.t.Column: THE ONCE AND FUTURE SANTA MONICA CIVIC AUDITORIUM

September 18, 2023

September 18, 2023

This week SMa.r.t. is focusing on the historic Civic Center Auditorium and residents’ efforts to save it from a misdirected...

S.M.a.r.t Column: The Battle for the Planning Commission: A Circus of Political Maneuvers

September 10, 2023

September 10, 2023

Ah, the wonderful world of city politics! Ladies and gentlemen hold on to your hats as we delve into the...

S.M.a.r.t Column: The 30 MPH City Part 2

September 4, 2023

September 4, 2023

Last week’s article discussed why we need to continue our program to slow down our streets to save lives, given...

S.M.a.r.t Column: The 30 MPH City Part One

August 27, 2023

August 27, 2023

Some ideas sound extreme when first presented but acquire more credibility when you think about it, and particularly when conditions...

Open Letter On the California Voting Rights Case Against the City of Santa Monica

August 25, 2023

August 25, 2023

By Oscar de la Torre Like many Santa Monicans and Californians who care about fair elections, I watched the California...

S.M.a.r.t article: Save the Civic – Keep it Alive

August 6, 2023

August 6, 2023

Santa Monica Civic Auditorium: A Historic Gem That Shaped Our City’s Cultural Legacy. Save Santa Monica’s Heritage The Santa Monica...

SMa.r.t. Column: Counseling The City Council

July 28, 2023

July 28, 2023

This week, our SMa.r.t. column is authored by concerned resident Nikki Kolhoff. Nikki has been an active voice in the...

SMa.r.t. column: The Impact of Private Companies on Our City Streets: A Call for Safety

July 21, 2023

July 21, 2023

As someone who’s always out and about, whether walking, biking, or driving, this writer has noticed a worrying trend that...

A Seismic Duality

July 21, 2023

July 21, 2023

Last month the City issued a follow-up report on its success in complying with its Seismic Retrofit Program. This 2017...

SMa.r.t. Column: The Future Of Santa Monica Airport (SMO)

July 4, 2023

July 4, 2023

On January 1, 2029, the City Council will be given the legal right to vote on whether to maintain the...

A Comfortable City for All

June 23, 2023

June 23, 2023

Picture this: a concerned citizen takes to Facebook to ask about the mysteriously vanishing benches and chairs on the Promenade....

An Open Letter To Santa Monica

June 16, 2023

June 16, 2023

Declining Business Climate in Downtown Santa Monica By Jennifer Rush, Blue Plate Restaurant Group To all that do business, live,...

Thirsty Santa Monica: Running Dry

June 11, 2023

June 11, 2023

The thirst is real, and Santa Monica is feeling it. The problem? Santa Monica relies on the Metropolitan Water District...

Landmarks Commission Back From the Dead

June 2, 2023

June 2, 2023

For over three years, SMa.r.t. (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow) has consistently warned that recently increased intense development...