July 26, 2024 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Pacific Ocean Park– A Positive & Optimistic Place in Santa Monica’s History

It’s the Holidays again, and we hope your spirits of joy and happiness are being well celebrated! In continuation of about remembering Santa Monica’s past and influences on local development here, we would like to turn the page back once again to memorialize a moment in time that was positive and festive in our city’s history.

Most of us know or have heard of Pacific Ocean Park, widely referred to as “P.O.P.” (not to be confused with Pacific Park). P.O.P., in its time, brought joy and happiness to city residents, families, and visitors from all over. It was like a little mirror, an extension of the happiest place on earth, Disneyland, but closer for most Angelenos, and it was at our beach! 

P.O.P. opened more than half a century ago on Saturday, July 28, 1958, with an attendance of about 20,000. The next day, it drew 37,262, outperforming Disneyland. Admission was 90 cents for adults. This was a local amusement park that transformed the old carnival-style beach and pier concepts into a new Space-age architecture and Science fiction themes of the late 1950s representing America’s optimism for its future, full of our culture’s promises and dreams for a better tomorrow. It was a place full of fun, hope, happiness, and fantasy, a place to come together and enjoy, and that’s what a great amusement park is all about.

There were notable contributors to its concept and design; for example, the Mid-Century Architectural firm Pereira & Luckman, which developed many noted structures in Southern California, including the iconic Theme Building at Los Angeles International Airport, CBS Television City, and Marineland of the Pacific. These were a lasting part of our unique identity here in Los Angeles, and P.O.P. symbolized Santa Monica and relaxed, fun beach living. Fred Harpman, who had designed portions of Disneyland’s Main Street, also had a major role in its design.

Many of P.O.P.’s designs were examples of what is known as “Googie Design,” The iconic and unique genius of this design style in a relatively brief era in our history was represented there and should be remembered. For example, there was a sizeable starfish-shaped structure at the entrance (mirroring the LAX icon), creatively mixing nautical elements with the then-inspired modern space age-sci-fi. Some of the famous rides included:

  • Sea Serpent Roller Coaster
  • Mystery Island Banana Train Ride
  • Flight to Mars 
  • Davey Jones Locker
  • Round the World in 80 Turns
  • Flying Dutchman
  • Space Wheels 
  • And many others….

Also, there was the Fisherman’s Cove and the International Promenade, with international restaurants and stores.

P.O.P. symbolized a unique and special time when America dreamed of how once impossible things could become a reality if we had the vision, belief, and determination to work together for the long haul rather than settling for an easier objective in the short-term or, worse yet, giving up. Let us acknowledge this and memorialize this significant time in our history.

P.O.P. was also a place to hear live music ranging from Frank Sinatra and Lawrence Welk to Pink Floyd and Janis Joplin, reflecting our changing cultural spectrum. It was also a place that supported community events. It played an important positive and constructive role because it reinforced the Santa Monica image of being a beach location, a place to come to relax and enjoy the happier and simple things that Santa Monica offers. It marked our unique contribution to the fabric of Los Angeles.

Some years after, there were higher-than-expected maintenance and repair costs coupled with the daunting economic pressures of redesigning and building new rides and attractions to keep visitors coming. All that was combined with management issues and a decline in income and visitors, which was exacerbated by a real estate development “vision” to clean up the area, ripping down numerous original (historical) beach bungalows and other vintage architecture to build new high-rises (Santa Monica Shores), tearing up many of the roads leading to P.O.P., terminally hindering traffic access and helping to hammer the final nail in the coffin.

There were monies owed for rent and back taxes and creditors, including the City of Santa Monica, who moved legally to collect, and P.O.P. closed on October 6, 1967, and its assets were auctioned off. Some of the rides were purchased and still exist elsewhere.

The proceeds were used to pay off creditors, and then the dilapidated ruins became a favorite surfing area and hangout for derelicts and drug users. Then a series of fires, criminal activity, and vandalism finally destroyed it completely. It was demolished in the winter of 1974-75. What remains are only some underwater pilings and signs warning of them; to the north, the original Santa Monica Pier features a newer amusement park, similarly called Pacific Park.

Nothing can be done about what’s happened. However, we can make a symbolic memorial to P.O.P., documenting its existence for our residents and visitors. Santa Monica residents like Richard Orton have made an attractive proposal for Santa Monica to build a small P.O.P. memorial with a design to be approved describing its history. This would be located across from the Santa Monica Shores near the bike path near P.O.P.’s location. It would be a place to read about the location’s history, see some photos and have another place to sit and relax. 

Many residents here during that time would appreciate the value of acknowledging this special time in history. Since that section of the beach is relatively empty, there would be minimal impact on the area. P.O.P. was a great place, and it deserves homage rather than to be left as a wisp of memory. As it was one of the happiest places on Earth, it’s not much to ask.

Michael Jolly, AIRCRE

S.M.a.r.t Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow

Ron Goldman, Architect FAIA; Dan Jansenson, Architect, Building & Fire-Life Safety Commissioner; Robert H. Taylor, Architect AIA; Thane Roberts, Architect; Mario Fonda-Bonardi, Architect AIA Planning Commissioner; Sam Tolkin, Architect, Planning Commissioner; Marc Verville, M.B.A. City Audit Sub-Committee Member, CPA-inactive; Michael Jolly AIRCRE 

For previous articles, see www.santamonicaarch.wordpress.com/writing

santamonicasmart@gmail.com

in Opinion
Related Posts

Food, Water, and Energy Part 2 of 4

July 21, 2024

July 21, 2024

Last week’s S.M.a,r,t, article (https://smmirror.com/2024/07/sm-a-r-t-column-food-water-and-energy-part-1-of-3/) talked about the seismic risks to the City from getting its three survival essentials, food,...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Food Water and Energy Part 1 of 3

July 14, 2024

July 14, 2024

Civilization, as we know it, requires many things, but the most critical and fundamental is an uninterrupted supply of three...

Letter to the Editor: Criticizing Israeli Policy Is Not Antisemitic

July 10, 2024

July 10, 2024

In the past several months, we’ve seen increasing protests against Israel’s actions in Gaza. We have also seen these protests...

SMA.R.T. WISHES ALL A VERY HAPPY 4TH OF JULY WEEK

July 7, 2024

July 7, 2024

We trust you are enjoying this holiday in celebration of Independence. Independence to be embraced, personally and civically, thru active...

SM.a.r.t Column: Santa Monica Under SCAG’s Boot

June 30, 2024

June 30, 2024

Four years ago, our esteemed colleague Mario Fonda-Bonardi wrote the prescient essay below when much of the legislative development juggernaut...

SM.a.r.t Column: The Up Zoning Scam (Part 2)

June 23, 2024

June 23, 2024

Last week’s SMart article  (https://smmirror.com/2024/06/sm-a-r-t-column-the-up-zoning-scam-part-1/)  discussed the ambitious 8895 units (including 6168 affordable units) that Santa Monica is required to...

SM.a.r.t Column: The Up Zoning Scam (Part 1)

June 16, 2024

June 16, 2024

Over the last few years, the State of California has mandated a massive upzoning of cities to create capacity for...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Shape Up – On Steroids

June 9, 2024

June 9, 2024

Nine years ago, SMa.r.t wrote a series of articles addressing the adaptive re-use of existing structures. We titled one “Shape...

SM.a.r.t Column: The Challenge of Running a City When City Staff Have Different Priorities

June 2, 2024

June 2, 2024

Living in a city has its perks, but it can be a real headache when the folks running the show...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path to Affordable Ownership in Santa Monica

May 27, 2024

May 27, 2024

[Note: our guest author today is Andres Drobny, a former Professor of Economics at the University of London, the former...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path Forward for Santa Monica: Part II

May 19, 2024

May 19, 2024

As referenced in Part I of this article, the state’s use of faulty statistics and forceful legislation has left a...

SM.a.r.t. Column: A Path Forward for Santa Monica: Part I

May 12, 2024

May 12, 2024

To quickly summarize, California grapples with an ongoing housing crisis spurred by state implementation of over 100 policies and mandates...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Where Will Our Huddled Masses Sleep? Navigating California’s Affordable Housing Mandates

May 5, 2024

May 5, 2024

Just as Lady Liberty beckons the “huddled masses” of immigrants to America, cities like Santa Monica have an ethical obligation...

SM.a.r.t Column: SMCLC SPEAKS

April 28, 2024

April 28, 2024

SMart (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow) periodically invites guest columnists who have made a significant contribution to the...

SM.a.r.t Column: Building Modern Boxes Lacks Identity

April 21, 2024

April 21, 2024

In the relentless pursuit of modernity, cities worldwide have witnessed the rise of so-called architectural marvels in the form of...