June 1, 2025 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

SMa.r.t. Column: The Future Of Santa Monica Airport (SMO)

On January 1, 2029, the City Council will be given the legal right to vote on whether to maintain the airport or demolish it. There will be no middle ground. Currently, the City’s staff is in the process of evaluating the qualifications of consultants to identify and propose the best uses for the land, which should include maintaining it as an airport. As I indicated in a Planning Commission meeting where the process was being discussed, the choice of consultants can often predetermine the results. If you hire a firm that specializes in park design to do the evaluation, you are likely to see a recommendation for a park.

We must think of the future beyond 2028. The identity of this city is as tied to the existence of the airport as it is to the beach, and its demise will mean the diminishing of that identity as it would if the city were to propose the destruction of the Santa Monica Pier. Unlike the airport, of course, the Pier is listed on the National Registry of Historic Places. It is therefore protected from demolition. But the airport, although not on the National Registry, does actually create significant income for the city as well as being an asset to businesses that may want or are already located here. According to a Daily Press staff report in 2011, the airport generated the sum of 275.2 million per year, which, adjusted for 2023, is 363.6 million. It would be quite a loss to our cash-strapped town.

By 2028 there will be hybrid and all-electric aircraft that will to a great extent, quash the issues concerning noise and pollution. There are other equally environmentally friendly aviation-related uses that are being developed, which would enhance the airport’s potential as a civic asset of importance. Simply the airport has always been in the DNA or identity of this City. Like the Santa Monica Pier, we need the airport. We are identified as a city by it. Without it, there is little left to distinguish our city from any other seaside extension of the City of Los Angeles.

Also, let’s not forget although the airport itself may not be registered in the national registry, the rotating beacon is landmarked, and the airport’s history is etched in the history of aviation.

Now for those, including perhaps some of our city’s staff, who wish that the City Council votes to close the airport and build a regional park, be careful what you wish for. The airport, should it be closed, will face the obvious development pressure that has been evident throughout our city over the last ten-plus years, resulting in such recent proposed projects as the incredibly dense Gelson’s submittal for 521 units on less than 5 acres with virtually no open space, and a recent applied for 15 story 2000 unit tower. Per the staff presentation to the council in January, it was acknowledged that there are no funds to, in fact, create a regional park. 

Even if the City were to find the funds, would it not be more advantageous and make better planning sense to build many smaller pedestrian-accessible parks in the neighborhoods where, by all estimates, there is and will continue to be enormous residential growth? This is especially true in the downtown, where an urban park is urgently needed, and along the Lincoln Boulevard corridor, where significant development is in process. Unless by 2028 there is an effective national response to homelessness, a park at the airport site might become, unfortunately, a regional encampment site.

Small parks, properly designed with amenities for all ages in our many neighborhoods.  will, I believe, promote family-oriented life in our town, as well as help assure that with affordable housing, there will be a balance in the social economic makeup of our population. Some money might better be used to update the facilities at existing parks.

For those who adamantly believe that a regional park is the highest and best use for the airport property after 2028, I must reiterate, “BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR.”

Samuel Tolkin, Architect & Planning Commissioner

For SMa.r.t.

Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow

Dan Jansenson, Architect, Building & Fire-Life Safety Commissioner; Thane Roberts, Architect; Robert H. Taylor, Architect AIA; Mario Fonda-Bonardi, Architect AIA Planning Commissioner; Sam Tolkin, Architect, Planning Commissioner; Michael Jolly, ARECRE

For previous articles, see www.santamonicaarch.wordpress.com/writing

<>Related Posts

Palisades Village to Reopen in 2026 with Revamped Retail, Dining, and Community Spaces

May 29, 2025

May 29, 2025

Elysewalker Set to Return With Park Reconstruction, Holiday Events, and Streetscape Upgrades Palisades Village, the open-air shopping and lifestyle destination...

SM.a.r.t Column: Oops!! What Happened? And What Are You Going to Do About It?

May 29, 2025

May 29, 2025

Our Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow (SMa.r.t) articles have, over the past 12 years, collectively presented a critical...

County Assessor Stresses Need For Fire-Affected Households to Update Addresses to Receive Relief Checks

May 28, 2025

May 28, 2025

Assessor’s Office Offers Automatic Tax Relief for Fire-Affected Homeowners Following the destruction caused by wildfires earlier this year, the Los...

SM.a.r.t Column: Why Santa Monica Might Need a Desalination Plant, and Maybe Even Nuclear Power

May 22, 2025

May 22, 2025

Santa Monica is known for its ocean views, sunny skies, and strong environmental values. But there’s a challenge on the...

Film Review: Final Destination: Bloodlines

May 22, 2025

May 22, 2025

FILM REVIEWFINAL DESTINATION: BLOODLINESRated R110 MinutesReleased May 16th  This is the sixth entry in the Final Destination movie franchise that...

State Farm Seeks New Insurance Rate Hikes for California Homeowners and Renters

May 20, 2025

May 20, 2025

Insurer Aims to Raise Premiums by up to 52% for Some Policyholders by 2026 Just one week after receiving approval...

Historic ‘Parry Residence’ in Pacific Palisades Lists for $25M

May 19, 2025

May 19, 2025

It is one of the earliest homes constructed in the Huntington Palisades and was prominently featured in a 1930 issue...

10-Unit Venice Townhouse with Ocean Views Listed for $6M

May 19, 2025

May 19, 2025

Built in 1975, the 14,025-square-foot structure sits on a 7,971-square-foot corner lot  A 10-unit townhouse complex just steps from the...

Elon Musk’s Tesla Renews Santa Monica Lease for 82,000-Square-Foot Service Center

May 18, 2025

May 18, 2025

Tesla Keeps California Roots with Santa Monica Service Center Renewal Despite relocating its corporate headquarters to Texas, Tesla has reaffirmed...

SM.a.r.t Column: SMO (So Many Options) Part 3: “Pie in the Sky”

May 17, 2025

May 17, 2025

SMO: Fantasy, Fact, and the Fog of Wishful ThinkingBy someone who read the fine print Every few months, a headline...

City to Issue Solicitations for Affordable Housing Development at Bergamot Station Arts Center

May 12, 2025

May 12, 2025

Proposals for the Bergamot Station Arts Center must prioritize maximizing affordable housing units while also considering potential artist housing and...

Historic Lloyd Wright-Designed Palisades Home Hits Market at $12.9M

May 12, 2025

May 12, 2025

Wright, the son of Frank Lloyd Wright, designed the estate for an Academy-winning composer A historic estate designed by architect...

Top Malibu Sale of 2025: Oceanfront Malibu Colony Home Sells for $26.8M

May 11, 2025

May 11, 2025

Old Hollywood-Era Home Sells After Over a Year on the Market Topping Malibu’s residential sales charts for the year, a...

(PHOTOS) Stevie Nicks’ Former Marina del Rey Condo Hits Market at $3.9M

May 6, 2025

May 6, 2025

The 2,091-square-foot condo occupies the second floor of a 1972-built structure and features sweeping ocean views A beachfront condominium in...

Santa Monica Could Require Large Buildings to Cut Emissions

May 5, 2025

May 5, 2025

A public meeting to discuss the proposal and gather community feedback is scheduled for May 8 Santa Monica is preparing...