October 4, 2023 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

SMa.r.t. Column: The Future Of Santa Monica Airport (SMO)

On January 1, 2029, the City Council will be given the legal right to vote on whether to maintain the airport or demolish it. There will be no middle ground. Currently, the City’s staff is in the process of evaluating the qualifications of consultants to identify and propose the best uses for the land, which should include maintaining it as an airport. As I indicated in a Planning Commission meeting where the process was being discussed, the choice of consultants can often predetermine the results. If you hire a firm that specializes in park design to do the evaluation, you are likely to see a recommendation for a park.

We must think of the future beyond 2028. The identity of this city is as tied to the existence of the airport as it is to the beach, and its demise will mean the diminishing of that identity as it would if the city were to propose the destruction of the Santa Monica Pier. Unlike the airport, of course, the Pier is listed on the National Registry of Historic Places. It is therefore protected from demolition. But the airport, although not on the National Registry, does actually create significant income for the city as well as being an asset to businesses that may want or are already located here. According to a Daily Press staff report in 2011, the airport generated the sum of 275.2 million per year, which, adjusted for 2023, is 363.6 million. It would be quite a loss to our cash-strapped town.

By 2028 there will be hybrid and all-electric aircraft that will to a great extent, quash the issues concerning noise and pollution. There are other equally environmentally friendly aviation-related uses that are being developed, which would enhance the airport’s potential as a civic asset of importance. Simply the airport has always been in the DNA or identity of this City. Like the Santa Monica Pier, we need the airport. We are identified as a city by it. Without it, there is little left to distinguish our city from any other seaside extension of the City of Los Angeles.

Also, let’s not forget although the airport itself may not be registered in the national registry, the rotating beacon is landmarked, and the airport’s history is etched in the history of aviation.

Now for those, including perhaps some of our city’s staff, who wish that the City Council votes to close the airport and build a regional park, be careful what you wish for. The airport, should it be closed, will face the obvious development pressure that has been evident throughout our city over the last ten-plus years, resulting in such recent proposed projects as the incredibly dense Gelson’s submittal for 521 units on less than 5 acres with virtually no open space, and a recent applied for 15 story 2000 unit tower. Per the staff presentation to the council in January, it was acknowledged that there are no funds to, in fact, create a regional park. 

Even if the City were to find the funds, would it not be more advantageous and make better planning sense to build many smaller pedestrian-accessible parks in the neighborhoods where, by all estimates, there is and will continue to be enormous residential growth? This is especially true in the downtown, where an urban park is urgently needed, and along the Lincoln Boulevard corridor, where significant development is in process. Unless by 2028 there is an effective national response to homelessness, a park at the airport site might become, unfortunately, a regional encampment site.

Small parks, properly designed with amenities for all ages in our many neighborhoods.  will, I believe, promote family-oriented life in our town, as well as help assure that with affordable housing, there will be a balance in the social economic makeup of our population. Some money might better be used to update the facilities at existing parks.

For those who adamantly believe that a regional park is the highest and best use for the airport property after 2028, I must reiterate, “BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR.”

Samuel Tolkin, Architect & Planning Commissioner

For SMa.r.t.

Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow

Dan Jansenson, Architect, Building & Fire-Life Safety Commissioner; Thane Roberts, Architect; Robert H. Taylor, Architect AIA; Mario Fonda-Bonardi, Architect AIA Planning Commissioner; Sam Tolkin, Architect, Planning Commissioner; Michael Jolly, ARECRE

For previous articles, see www.santamonicaarch.wordpress.com/writing

Related Posts

(Video) Look Inside $3.1M “Developer’s Dream” Home With Artist’s Studio

October 2, 2023

October 2, 2023

The 7,801 square foot property comes with a detached guest house and a modern wood deck. @smmirrornews The 3 bedroom...

Spanish Contemporary Home With Pink Mirrored Cocktail Bar on Market for $6.5M

October 2, 2023

October 2, 2023

There’s a Private Oasis With a Pool, Jacuzzi, and Verdant Backyard Situated in the Santa Monica Canyon, this residence presents...

Global Surfing Association to Leave Santa Monica, Lists Main Street Office Space

October 2, 2023

October 2, 2023

The Association’s New Location Is Set to Be Ready by November By Zach Armstrong The office headquarters of professional surfing...

S.M.a.r.t Column: Architect’s Son Reflects On Civic Auditorium

October 2, 2023

October 2, 2023

Welton (David) Becket (1902-1969), pictured above, backed by a picture of our Civic Auditorium, was the designer of that famed...

Writers Guild and AMPTP Reach Tentative Agreement After 146-Day Strike

September 25, 2023

September 25, 2023

Picketing Is Suspended For Now, Contract Language To Be Finalized By Dolores Quintana Around 7:30 p.m. tonight, the Writers Guild...

40-Unit Mixed-Use Project Proposed for 26th Street Intersection

September 25, 2023

September 25, 2023

A Smaller Two-Story Structure Featuring Five Residences Is Also Proposed Plans for a mixed-use development set to grace the corner...

Lebanese Art Collectors List Renovated Santa Monica Estate for $33 Million

September 25, 2023

September 25, 2023

Constructed in the Early 1980s by Peter Choate, the Dwelling Is Nestled Within a Gated Parcel of Over Half an...

S.M.a.r.t Column: Civic Center Debate

September 24, 2023

September 24, 2023

Civic Center Debate Last year, the City declared the Civic Center Auditorium surplus property after a decade of neglect and...

Homeless Suspect Attacks Man in Palisades Park For Video Recording

September 22, 2023

September 22, 2023

The Suspect Was Taken Into Custody For Felony Battery, Robbery, and Elder Abuse On Tuesday, Sept. 19, at approximately 3:30...

SMMUSD Assistant Superintendent Passes Away at 46

September 19, 2023

September 19, 2023

She Dedicated Six Years to SMMUSD in Her Current Role Dr. Jacqueline Mora, the Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services at...

(Video) 570 Housing Units Proposed at this Downtown Location

September 18, 2023

September 18, 2023

The project would be one of the largest recent developments for Santa Monica in terms of proposed housing. @smmirrornews 570...

Developer to Propose Five Story Mixed-Use Project Across Metro Terminus

September 18, 2023

September 18, 2023

The Project Would Include 6,883 Square Feet of Ground Floor Commercial Space By Zach Armstrong Local real estate developer Worthe...

SMa.r.t.Column: THE ONCE AND FUTURE SANTA MONICA CIVIC AUDITORIUM

September 18, 2023

September 18, 2023

This week SMa.r.t. is focusing on the historic Civic Center Auditorium and residents’ efforts to save it from a misdirected...

(Video) Activision Santa Monica Headquarters to be Bought by JP Morgan Chase

September 11, 2023

September 11, 2023

JP Morgan Chase is set to buy this Santa Monica office building that houses Activision and GoodrX @smmirrornews JP Morgan...

Council to Vote on Downtown Affordable Housing Development

September 11, 2023

September 11, 2023

The Project Calls for 570 Housing Units By Zach Armstrong The Santa Monica City Council is set to vote on...