October 18, 2024 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

OP-Ed Response to DTSM Board Chair Barry Snell and Plea to City Council Regarding Safety Ambassadors and Ambassador Program

I am responding to the OP-ED (dated June 7, 2022, Santa Monica Mirror) by City-appointed DTSM Board Member and now Board Chair, Barry Snell, regarding his support of DTSM using about $550,000 every month of Stakeholder Assessment money to pay for (1) Hospitality Ambassadors to greet and direct visitors from 6 am to 11 pm, (2) Maintenance Ambassadors to walk/follow City Maintenance crews around from 4 am to 11 pm, and (3) unarmed Safety Ambassadors to walk or ride bikes from Ocean Avenue to Lincoln Blvd. 

As crazy as this sounds, Block-by-Block is paying their Ambassadors between $16.40 to $19.10 an hour, then charging DTSM $32 + + an hour. In addition, DTSM has agreed to continue paying Block-by-Block for 3,900 hours….in advance. There is nobody who is making sure these folks are doing their job.

In addition, City Staff is recommending that City Council extend a contract with Allied Universal Security Services for hours between 12 midnight and 6 am, without competitive bidding through the end of the year. In making this recommendation to the City Council, Staff has not reached out to the assessment-paying Stakeholders for any input.

In the Garages and alleyways, incidents of theft, tire slashings, people sleeping in cars, people dealing drugs, have increased, not decreased. Allied Security has done an awful job, ‘ missing in action’, mainly because they do not show up and walk their assigned areas. When they do show up it is for a total of an hour at intermittent times. The assigned guard has stated he is afraid, and oftentimes will stay away from those sleeping in the garages or dealing drugs. They are armed, he is not. If the Guard sees something illegal he must still call 911. But we have insufficient police officers to even respond at night within 45 minutes to 911 calls on the Promenade and in Downtown. Guards and Ambassadors are afraid and intimidated by a new criminal element that has taken over, especially at night. 

The criminal element is fully aware there is no Police presence at night. 

Many Stakeholders and I are unrepresented by our current DTSM Board, and are adamantly opposed to wasting more funds on the Block-by-Block Ambassadors. $5 million a year spent on Ambassadors is better spent on 44 full time additional Santa Monica Police Officers or, about 20 Sheriff’s Deputies and 9 Sergeants at night. 

And these amounts should be coming out of the City Budget, not from DTSM Stakeholders. Santa Monica is one of the highest taxed cities in the state and country, and yet we are all fearing for our safety.

For the immediate future, our proposal is for DTSM to discuss using our Stakeholder funds for an interim contract with the LA County Sheriff’s Department to patrol and secure our streets nightly between 11 pm and 6 am. The Sheriff’s Department has stated this is an immediate and viable option. in the last DTSM Board Meeting, Board Chair Barry Snell said the idea would be met with “widespread opposition, that the idea was a non-starter”. We disagree. 

Barry Snell’s statement, and the follow-up suggestion by City-appointed DTSM Board Member Juan Matute, to raise assessments by 5%, without even having a budget in place, speak volumes about how they love making decisions using other people’s money.

Notwithstanding, before DTSM can enter into a contract with any third party for an amount over $250,000 (which both the Block-by-Block Ambassador Program and Allied Universal Security Systems contracts each amount to), there must be transparency and a competitive bidding process. The plans put forth by DTSM’s Barry Snell and his Board are defective and premature.

I also question the integrity of Richard Mongarro, hired in December as DTSM’s Operations Manager. He is pushing too hard for immediate approval of the contract with his immediate past employer, Block-by-Block.. We have asked if Richard Mongarro will be compensated or paid any consulting fee by Block-by-Block if their Ambassador contract is extended. But Barry Snell and Interim Director John Hunter have refused to answer. Why? We saw what happened during the last 2 years when certain DTSM employees had access to DTSM’s Credit card. DTSM is now being independently investigated by 3 public agencies. Please see link below –

https://www.mercurynews.com/2008/04/24/sergeant-charged-with-embezzling-from-cop-charity/

Many more statements made by DTSM Board Chair Barry Snell are incorrect. The truth is –

1) The Ambassadors are ineffective. Some are allowing the homeless and drug users to enter the Dumpster Rooms and sleep at night. We have photos and video clips to prove this. Some advise homeless of certain storefronts they can stay in front of all night. We have video clips of this as well.

2) The DTSM Board of Directors is NOT composed of an equal number of City-appointed and Property/Business Owner Members.The City Manager or his appointee makes the Board unequally represented.

3) The Ambassador Program, and specifically the Safety Ambassador program, have not been in existence since the Property-Based Assessment was established. The program was supposed to be a 6-month trial experiment. Since its inception, crime and homeless in our garages, alleyways and front and rear storefronts have increased. Even the fronts of residential apartment buildings and libraries in our Downtown are affected.

Without the Stakeholder assessments, there would be no DTSM. The City-appointed Board Members of DTSM need to listen to the Stakeholders. There is a huge disconnect:

DTSM’s agenda is a failed social experiment. 

Visitors, patrons and business owners have stated they WANT to see armed law enforcement – either more Santa Monica Police or in the interim, Deputies of the LA County Sheriff’s Department. Restaurant employees, business owners, even City Maintenance workers and Safety Ambassadors are being physically attacked as they perform their jobs, walk the streets, and arrive and leave their place of work. 

On average 7 residents, visitors and business owners are assaulted per month within our Downtown. There are 3 storefronts smashed each month. There are 6 “walk-in, grab and walk-out” incidents on the 3 blocks of the Promenade every week. Assaults and fentanyl, meth and heroin are killing 4 homeless people a month in our alleyways and parks.

It is clear to all who walk the Promenade and our Downtown that we are failing. City Councilmembers, please DO NOT approve renewing these same contracts. Your own studies acknowledge that 86% of our City residents are not patronizing Downtown or the Promenade.

John Alle

Santa Monica Property and Business Owner
DTSM Assessment-paying Stakeholder
Santa Monica Bayside Owners Association Member
Santa Monica Coalition Member

in Opinion
Related Posts

SM.a.r.t. Column: Vote

October 13, 2024

October 13, 2024

In a polarized country or City every vote counts. Regardless of which side of any issue or candidate you support,...

SM.a.r.t Column: Fact-Checking Election-Season Windbaggery

October 6, 2024

October 6, 2024

Claim: The state is requiring Santa Monica to build 9,000 apartments.Answer: Partially true, partially false. Santa Monica has a pretty...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Public Safety and Traffic Enforcement Can Help Save Lives and Revitalize Santa Monica’s Economy

September 29, 2024

September 29, 2024

We wholeheartedly endorse the candidates below for Santa Monica City Council. Their leading campaign platform is for increased safety in...

SM.a.r.t Column: Crime in Santa Monica: A Growing Concern and the Need for Prioritizing Public Safety

September 22, 2024

September 22, 2024

By Michael Jolly Over the past six months, Santa Monica has experienced a concerning rise in crime, sparking heated discussions...

SM.a.r.t Column: Ten New Commandments

September 15, 2024

September 15, 2024

Starting last week,  the elementary school students of Louisiana will all face mandatory postings of the biblical Ten Commandments in...

SM.a.r.t Column: Santa Monica’s Next City Council

September 8, 2024

September 8, 2024

In the next general election, this November 5th, Santa Monica residents will be asked to vote their choices among an...

SM.a.r.t Column: Part II: The Affordability Crisis: Unmasking California’s RHNA Process and Its Role in Gentrification

September 2, 2024

September 2, 2024

Affordability: An Income and Available Asset Gap Issue, Not a Supply Issue (Last week’s article revealed how state mandates became...

SM.a.r.t Column: Part 1: The Affordability Crisis: Unmasking California’s RHNA Process and Its Role in Gentrification

August 26, 2024

August 26, 2024

In the world of economic policy, good intentions often pave the way to unintended consequences. Nowhere is this more evident...

SM.a.r.t Column: They Want to Build a Wall

August 18, 2024

August 18, 2024

Every once in a while, a topic arises that we had previously written about but doesn’t seem to go away....

SM.a.r.t Column: Sharks vs. Batteries – Part 5 of 5

August 11, 2024

August 11, 2024

This is the last SMart article in an expanding  5 part series about our City’s power, water, and food prospects....

SM.a.r.t Column: Your Home’s First Battery Is in Your Car

August 4, 2024

August 4, 2024

This is the fourth in a series of SM.a.r.t articles about food, water, and energy issues in Santa Monica. You...

SM.a.r.t Column: Food Water and Energy Part 3 of 4

July 28, 2024

July 28, 2024

Our previous two S.M.a,r,t, articles talked about the seismic risks to the City from getting its three survival essentials: food,...

Food, Water, and Energy Part 2 of 4

July 21, 2024

July 21, 2024

Last week’s S.M.a,r,t, article (https://smmirror.com/2024/07/sm-a-r-t-column-food-water-and-energy-part-1-of-3/) talked about the seismic risks to the City from getting its three survival essentials, food,...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Food Water and Energy Part 1 of 3

July 14, 2024

July 14, 2024

Civilization, as we know it, requires many things, but the most critical and fundamental is an uninterrupted supply of three...

Letter to the Editor: Criticizing Israeli Policy Is Not Antisemitic

July 10, 2024

July 10, 2024

In the past several months, we’ve seen increasing protests against Israel’s actions in Gaza. We have also seen these protests...