November 25, 2024 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

SM.a.r.t Column: It’s Time To Inspect Balconies

About nine years ago, a fifth-floor balcony in a Berkeley apartment building collapsed, tragically killing several students gathered on it and injuring others. Investigations suggested that poor construction and maintenance, especially problems with waterproofing that led to dry rot, weakened the balcony’s supports.

To prevent similar disasters, California passed new laws requiring regular inspections of balconies in apartment buildings and condominiums. Here’s a rundown of what these laws—SB721 and AB2579 for rental apartments and SB326 for condos—entail.

What Do These Laws Require?

Each jurisdiction has the final authority to establish and enforce its own compliance deadlines, provided they align with state laws. In Santa Monica, for rental buildings with three or more units, owners must inspect all exterior balconies and similar structures by January 1, 2026 (with the new state-mandated extension), with inspections repeated every six years. This rule applies to large apartment buildings, mixed-use buildings, triplexes, and fourplexes. Newly constructed buildings need to complete their first inspection within six years of receiving a Certificate of Occupancy, then every six years.

Condo associations must inspect all balconies by January 1, 2025, but they have a nine-year cycle for follow-up inspections. For new condo buildings, the first inspection should occur within six years of receiving a Certificate of Occupancy, then every nine years.

What Happens If Inspections Aren’t Done?

For rental buildings, there are no automatic state penalties if owners skip inspections. However, local governments can choose to enforce this law and issue penalties if they want. At the moment, Santa Monica doesn’t fine owners who miss the deadlines, but that may change as deadlines approach.

Condo associations also face no state penalties for skipping inspections, but they’re required to include inspection findings in a legally mandated reserve study. The state can fine associations if this reserve study isn’t completed as required.

What About Repairs?

If an inspection finds repairs are needed, building owners have 120 days to obtain a building permit. After that, inspectors must notify the city’s code enforcement agency, which gives owners 120 days to finish the work before imposing daily fines of $100 to $500. For condo associations, there’s no penalty from the state if repairs aren’t done, so condo owners rely on their HOA boards to get things fixed.

Key Deadlines to Know

For older rental buildings the first inspection deadline is January 1, 2026. For condos, the first inspection deadline is January 1, 2025. For new rental buildings, the deadline comes six years after getting a Certificate of Occupancy, which can vary depending on when construction is completed. For many newer buildings, this could be around 2028, due to the typical construction timeline.

Are There Penalties in Santa Monica?

Currently, Santa Monica doesn’t have local penalties for landlords who miss inspection deadlines. But the city should be ready to enforce repair deadlines for buildings that finish inspections early. It’s crucial for code enforcement to step in to make sure repairs are done on time when they’re needed.

Who Can Do These Inspections?

For rental buildings, inspections can be performed by a Certified Building Inspector, a licensed architect, or a licensed structural or civil engineer. The city sets specific requirements for qualifications. For condos, only licensed structural engineers or architects can perform inspections.

After Berkeley’s tragic balcony collapse, these state laws provide a framework to help prevent future tragedies. But it’s ultimately up to city authorities to ensure rental owners follow through on inspections and repairs. Santa Monica may need to put penalties in place for landlords who don’t comply and enforce deadlines. For condo residents, talking with your HOA about inspections and repairs can be a lifesaving step.

Daniel Jansenson, Architect, Building & Fire-Life Safety Commission

Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow
Robert H. Taylor AIA, Architect; Dan Jansenson, Architect & Building and Fire-Life Safety Commission; Thane Roberts, Architect; Mario Fonda-Bonardi AIA, Architect; Samuel Tolkin Architect & Planning Commissioner; Michael Jolly, AIR-CRE; Marie Standing, Jack Hillbrand AIA, Architect & Landmarks Commissioner

in Opinion
<>Related Posts

S.M.a.r.t Column: Your City is Broke

November 18, 2024

November 18, 2024

On December 10, the new City council will be seated fresh from their dominant win in the recent elections. There...

SM.a.r.t Column: Moving Ahead to the Future

November 10, 2024

November 10, 2024

As we write this, the election results are still trickling in. We’ll leave the deep analysis to others, but the...

Opinion: Fact Check: Why Vote Yes on Measure QS

November 1, 2024

November 1, 2024

Despite living in a famously progressive region, Santa Monicans are not immune from the same political misinformation and disinformation that...

SM.a.r.t Column: Lack of Oversight and No Accountability

October 31, 2024

October 31, 2024

S.M.a.r.t. periodically invites guest columnists to write opinion articles on topics of particular interests to our readers. Below is an...

SM.a.r.t Column: “Help! I’ve Fallen, and I …!!”, Cries Santa Monica!

October 25, 2024

October 25, 2024

Maybe fallen, but slipping for sure from being a desirable beachfront community that served all equally, the local residents who...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Vote

October 13, 2024

October 13, 2024

In a polarized country or City every vote counts. Regardless of which side of any issue or candidate you support,...

SM.a.r.t Column: Fact-Checking Election-Season Windbaggery

October 6, 2024

October 6, 2024

Claim: The state is requiring Santa Monica to build 9,000 apartments.Answer: Partially true, partially false. Santa Monica has a pretty...

SM.a.r.t. Column: Public Safety and Traffic Enforcement Can Help Save Lives and Revitalize Santa Monica’s Economy

September 29, 2024

September 29, 2024

We wholeheartedly endorse the candidates below for Santa Monica City Council. Their leading campaign platform is for increased safety in...

SM.a.r.t Column: Crime in Santa Monica: A Growing Concern and the Need for Prioritizing Public Safety

September 22, 2024

September 22, 2024

By Michael Jolly Over the past six months, Santa Monica has experienced a concerning rise in crime, sparking heated discussions...

SM.a.r.t Column: Ten New Commandments

September 15, 2024

September 15, 2024

Starting last week,  the elementary school students of Louisiana will all face mandatory postings of the biblical Ten Commandments in...

SM.a.r.t Column: Santa Monica’s Next City Council

September 8, 2024

September 8, 2024

In the next general election, this November 5th, Santa Monica residents will be asked to vote their choices among an...

SM.a.r.t Column: Part II: The Affordability Crisis: Unmasking California’s RHNA Process and Its Role in Gentrification

September 2, 2024

September 2, 2024

Affordability: An Income and Available Asset Gap Issue, Not a Supply Issue (Last week’s article revealed how state mandates became...

SM.a.r.t Column: Part 1: The Affordability Crisis: Unmasking California’s RHNA Process and Its Role in Gentrification

August 26, 2024

August 26, 2024

In the world of economic policy, good intentions often pave the way to unintended consequences. Nowhere is this more evident...

SM.a.r.t Column: They Want to Build a Wall

August 18, 2024

August 18, 2024

Every once in a while, a topic arises that we had previously written about but doesn’t seem to go away....

SM.a.r.t Column: Sharks vs. Batteries – Part 5 of 5

August 11, 2024

August 11, 2024

This is the last SMart article in an expanding  5 part series about our City’s power, water, and food prospects....