January 2, 2025 Breaking News, Latest News, and Videos

Attorney in Voting Rights Case “99 Percent Certain” City Will Change to District Elections

Special election also possible.

By Sam Catanzaro

Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Yvette M. Palazuelos has ruled in favor of the Pico Neighborhood Association in a voting rights case against the City of Santa Monica, putting the future of at-large elections at stake in the City. The decision, which was handed down on November 5 and filed on November 8, was released to the public on November 13, says at-large elections in Santa Monica are in violation of the California Voting Rights Act (CRVA).

Both sides will appear in court December 7 for a post-trial hearing to decide the appropriate solution for violating the CVRA.

While the City said they plan on appealing the ruling, R. Rex Parris of Parris Law Firm, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, told the Santa Monica Mirror that he is “99 percent certain” Santa Monica will change to district-based elections. 

“I’m 99 percent certain that they are going to turn it into districts,” Parris said. “This means there will be a change in the power structure of Santa Monica. It will mean that people who are not able to raise hundreds of hundreds of thousands of dollars will now be able to compete in an election.”

Depending on what is decided at the December 7 hearing, Parris told the Mirror that the plaintiffs will ask the City to hold a special election to elect new City Councilmembers.

“As soon as that order becomes final the people sitting in office are sitting there illegally,” Parris said. “We will be asking her to order a special election.” 

The case, Pico Neighborhood Association et al. v. City of Santa Monica, pitted voting rights advocates against the City of Santa Monica. The plaintiffs, led by resident Maria Loya, argue that the City’s at-large election system dilutes the Latino vote in City Council elections and is in violation of the 2002 California Voting Rights Act, which was passed to increase opportunities for Latinos and other minorities to elect representatives of their choice.

The City, however, argues that Latinos do enjoy success in City Council elections, pointing to Latino Councilmember Tony Vazquez, who is one out of seven councilmembers. Defense lawyers argue that this makes City Council 14.3 percent Latino, greater than the 13.1 percent of the City’s 89,736 residents who are Hispanic or Latino. The City also points to Mayor Pro-Tempore Gleam Davis, who testified during the trial that her adopted parents told her that her biological father is from Mexico.

The City also argues that district-based elections will not substantially enhance Latino voting power. In addition, they claim that at-large elections make sense for the 8.3 square mile city, pointing to the fact that voters have twice rejected district-based elections in 1972 and 2002.

In a press release Tuesday, attorneys for the City indicated that they plan on appealing Judge Palazuelos’ decision.

“We received today the court’s tentative ruling. We are disappointed that it contains no reasoning in support of the court’s decision, which we believe is based on an unjustified adoption of the plaintiffs’ misguided and unsupported view of the law. In accordance with the court’s order, we will file briefing on the issue of remedies. Once the court’s ruling is final, we plan to appeal, which will allow the California Court of Appeal to address the significant legal issues of first impression posed by this case,” said defense lawyer Theodore J. Boutrous Jr., Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP.

Plaintiff attorney Parris, however, is confident that his plaintiffs will prevail in the event of an appeal and that they appeal by the City is a misuse of taxpayers’ dollars.

“Nobody has ever prevailed against a judge who has ordered a district-wide election because that clearly is the favored policy of the law,” Parris said. “All they want to do is spend the taxpayer’s money in order to stay in office…If I was a citizen of Santa Monica, I would be outraged that they spent millions of dollars, and indicate that they will spend millions more, just so they can stay in office illegally”

The Santa Monica Mirror has reached out to the City asking how much they estimate will be spent on legal fees in an appeal, but they have not responded at the time of publishing.

in News
<>Related Posts

French-Inspired Palisades Restaurant to Close After Six Years

January 2, 2025

January 2, 2025

The Menu Featured Dishes That Ranged From French Onion Soup to Locally Inspired Creations Like Radiatore With Lamb Bolognese The...

Suspect in Downtown Target Shooting Apprehended After Hourslong Standoff

January 2, 2025

January 2, 2025

The Arrest Came Less Than 24 Hours After a Shooting at the figat7th Shopping Mall That Left Two Target Employees...

Jennifer Smith Re-Elected as SMMUSD Board President, Laurie Lieberman Named Vice President

January 2, 2025

January 2, 2025

The Board Also Extended a Thank-You to Outgoing Vice President Jon Kean for His Service At its annual organizational meeting,...

Brentwood Beat: Maria’s Italian Kitchen to Move from Brentwood After 52 Years

January 1, 2025

January 1, 2025

I’m ill.   Maria’s Italian Kitchen is leaving Brentwood Village and will be gone by the end of 2024. Like many...

Chef Nobu Debuts Luxurious Gold Standard Roll for Golden Globes® Celebration

January 1, 2025

January 1, 2025

Indulge in a Limited-Time King Crab Roll Adorned With Gold Flakes and Caviar In honor of Chef Nobu Matsuhisa’s return...

110 Years Ago, Charlie Chaplin Debuted The Iconic “Tramp” Character From Venice Beach

December 30, 2024

December 30, 2024

The 1914 short Kid Auto Races at Venice introduced the iconic character that would become synonymous with silent film, sparking an international...

Gov. Newsom Touts New 2025 Laws to Strengthen Civil Rights and Inclusivity

December 30, 2024

December 30, 2024

The Laws Cover Various Aspects of Society, From Education to Property California Governor Gavin Newsom, in a recent news release,...

LAPD Seeks Additional Victims in West Los Angeles Sexual Assault Case

December 30, 2024

December 30, 2024

Hajhosseini Reportedly Pressured One Victim Into Consuming Alcohol, After Which She Lost Consciousness and Was Assaulted Detectives with the Los...

Santa Monica Gets Temporary Community Development Director

December 30, 2024

December 30, 2024

Yeo Has Been With the City of Santa Monica Since 2006, Starting as a Senior Planner and Eventually Leading the...

$75M Malibu Estate Hits Market on Coveted “Billionaire’s Beach”

December 29, 2024

December 29, 2024

The Home Offers Sweeping Views of the Queen’s Necklace, Palos Verdes, and Catalina Island A sprawling estate on Malibu’s exclusive...

UCLA Police Investigate Off-Campus Assault as Hate Crime

December 29, 2024

December 29, 2024

The Suspects Are Described as Four White or Middle Eastern Males in Their Early 20s The UCLA Police Department is...

(Video) At Vistamar School – Discover the way high school should be

December 29, 2024

December 29, 2024

Students achieve remarkable outcomes with our strong academics, small classes, andpersonalized approach. Our graduates don’t just attend college—they excel. Vistamar’sunique...

HUD Report Reveals Record 18% Surge in U.S. Homelessness in 2024

December 29, 2024

December 29, 2024

Despite the Rise, Veteran Homelessness Hits Record Low The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) released its 2024...

Film Review: The Brutalist

December 29, 2024

December 29, 2024

By Dolores Quintana Filled with grandeur as stark as the Brutalist architecture designed by László Tóth, The Brutalist is epic...

Santa Monica Man Arrested in Fatal Hit-and-Run of Vietnam Veteran

December 28, 2024

December 28, 2024

Suspect Faces Murder and Felony Charges; Police Recover Evidence Rod Sharif, a Santa Monica man, was arrested on December 27,...