AB 1740 would allow certain projects to bypass state coastal permitting review, with critics warning it could weaken environmental protections and public access to the coast.
A bill that would modify coastal development permitting rules in Santa Monica is advancing through the state Legislature, drawing both support and opposition as it moves to its next committee.
California Assembly Bill 1740, introduced by Assemblymember Rick Chavez Zbur, would allow certain cities to designate themselves as “urban multimodal communities” if they meet criteria related to transit access, climate planning and bicycle infrastructure.
Under the proposal, qualifying cities could approve a range of projects and activities within their coastal zones without requiring individual coastal development permits from the California Coastal Commission. These exemptions would apply to specific categories, including parking regulation changes, transportation improvements such as bike lanes and bus lanes, temporary community events, outdoor dining, and some building renovations or housing developments that meet defined conditions.
The legislation also permits interior and exterior modifications to existing buildings, provided expansions do not exceed 150% of the original footprint, and allows certain multifamily housing projects in designated areas without additional coastal permitting review, as outlined in the bill text.
The measure passed out of the Assembly Housing and Community Development Committee this month and has been referred to the Assembly Appropriations Committee for further consideration.
Supporters of the bill, including Zbur, say it is intended to streamline permitting for routine or lower-impact projects while maintaining oversight for developments that could significantly affect coastal resources. In a public statement, Zbur said the legislation is designed to “modernize” the coastal permitting process, reduce delays and costs, and support housing, transportation and climate goals without weakening core environmental protections.
Opposition groups have raised concerns about the scope of the proposed exemptions. The Surfrider Foundation argues the bill could reduce oversight of development and limit public input on coastal projects, potentially affecting beach access and environmental review. The organization has called for the removal of the exemptions included in the measure.
The bill’s current language focuses specifically on Santa Monica, according to legislative materials, and includes findings by lawmakers regarding the need for a statute tailored to that city.
